ReferencesBoggan, M., Harper, S., & Whitmire, A. (2010). Using manipulatives to teach elementary
mathematics. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3, 1–6. Dam, L. (2017). Stages of the Natural Approach [Video]. Retrieved from American College of Education’s Canvas Module 2 Presentations: https://ace.instructure.com/courses/1499523/files/77959697 module_item_id=17385600 Giordano, P. V. (2016). The effects of using the GoMath program on teaching computation skills for students with learning disabilities. Retrieved from https://rdw.rowan.edu /cgi/ viewcontent.cgi? article=2520&context=etd Goldenberg, C. (n.d.). Improving achievement for English learners: Conclusions from 2 research reviews. Retrieved from http://www.colorincolorado.org/article/improving-achievement-english-learners-conclusions-2- research-reviews Hill, J., & Flynn, K. (2006). Classroom instruction that works with English language learners. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Khattak, I., & Asrar, M. (2007). Stages of Language Acquisition in the Natural Approach to Language Teaching. Sarhad J. Agric, 23(1), 251-255. Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Retrieved from http://www.osea-cite.org/class/SELT_materials/SELT_Reading_Krashen_.pdf Meeks, J., Smith, T. (2016). Bilingual education programs and English learners in Illinois. Retrieved from https://www.isbe.net/Documents/el-program-stat-rpt14.pdf Prussing Elem school (PK-8). (2018). Retrieved from https://www.illinoisreportcard.com/ school.aspx?source=trends&source2=achievementgap&Schoolid=150162990252412 |